Language of Cosmoses

Looking around I see I've written sporadic posts on the language of cosmoses going back to 2005 (and earlier counting my work_celestial post), and it seems to me the subject was exhausted for me each time because it's like Work effort itself, you have to be in the third state. And also it is apparent that the language of cosmoses contains all the Work teaching within it. In one post I made an interesting connection between the language of cosmoses and man #6 (and objective consciousness). In another post I directly associated the language of cosmoses with the two conscious shocks. That is just shorthand to say that it is all the Work.

A practical first step is to actually recognize comsoses. This Earth we exist on/in is a living cosmos. That NASA photo is worthwhile to get into memory. To see and feel this when out and about (or inside even) is something that picks up our perspective in general. To see ourselves as a cosmos and how the basic Work practices can be seen in relation to ourselves as a cosmos is a practical thing to do. (The firmament of stars is even a cosmos. A different sort because we are seeing *it* outside its third dimensional representation. But it surrounds us.)

But a cosmos needs a boundary, a diaphanous shell, with no breaches (no Identification). Within it will be greater or lesser degree of accumulated energy. I wrote a note somewhere that said external considering other cosmoses enables us to know the true north of our own cosmos. It positions us. The axis is going to be Magnetic Center and stronger by degree (Observing I, Deputy Steward, Steward, Master, or Real I). Orbits will be defined by the influence we are in contact with. A, B, or C, to keep it simple. The substance, or body, of our cosmos will be greater or lesser degree of understanding, conscience/consciousness, Real Will. Etc.